🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Indigenous council members on New Zealand local authorities is set to be slashed by over 50%, after a controversial legislative amendment that forced municipal councils to put the future of hard-earned Māori seats to a public vote.

Historical Context on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have multiple elected officials depending on demographic data, were created in 2001 to give Māori electors the option to elect a assured Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Initially, local governments could only establish a Māori ward by first putting it to a community referendum in their area. Local populations frequently devoted considerable time generating community backing and pushing their local governments to create Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the former administration allowed local councils to establish a Māori ward without initially mandating them to subject it to a public vote.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, saying communities should decide whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Referendum Results

The new legislation required local authorities that had established a electoral district under the previous policy to hold decisive public votes concurrently with the local body elections, which ended on October 11. Of 42 councils participating in the public vote, 17 voted to retain their seats, and 25 to abolish theirs – revealing numerous areas opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes represented “a vital step in restoring local democratic control.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have condemned the government’s law change as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the current administration has ushered in sweeping rollbacks to policies designed to improve Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has said it wants to terminate “ethnic-specific” policies, and says it is committed to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – six of the seven cities mandated to hold referendums backed Māori wards, while rural regions skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

The recent local government elections registered the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with under one-third of citizens casting a vote, prompting demands for reform.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are permitted to establish different wards – including countryside seats – without initially mandating a community ballot. The different conditions placed on Indigenous representation suggested the administration was singling out Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement concerned the 17 areas that voted to keep their wards.